Monday, November 18, 2019

An Open Letter to Jane Fonda


Dear Ms. Fonda,
Kudos to you for rising up to draw attention to the crisis of climate change. You are an inspiration! I read the story about your protests in the NY Times and also watched your interview with Judy Woodruff.

You clearly articulated the gravity of the problem and say that we should listen to the scientists. As a scientist, I was gladdened to hear you say that. I hope you will also lend your voice to the only effective solution that scientists like James Hansen are telling us to embrace, namely nuclear power. To the extent that your movie, “The China Syndrome,” contributed to the public fear of radiation and nuclear power, your coming out in support of nuclear power would go a long way.

Image result for james hansen nuclear energy
Climate change is also a matter of social justice as it most adversely affects those who can least afford it and who contributed the least to bring it on. People need energy to lead healthy productive lives, and currently about half the world’s population does not have access to adequate energy. Social justice demands that the global supply of energy be increased to rectify this situation. However, burning fossil fuels, which are the easy source of energy, aggravates climate challenge.

Most champions of social justice movements call for rapidly expanding renewable energy sources like wind and solar. However, these intermittent, low-energy density sources cannot meet the energy demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Germany’s experience with Energiewende makes that amply clear. They spent over $550 billion but their greenhouse gas emissions are rising, because they have had to add lignite-burning plants. Further, wind and solar require inordinate amounts of materials. Meeting the global energy demand by renewables would require more than doubling the global production of basic commodities such as copper, steel, cement, and rare-earth metals with enormous environmental degradation from mining. Just replacing one coal power plant with wind and solar along with a modest amount of battery storage would require half the global production of lithium in 2018!

Nuclear power can produce vast quantities of carbon-free energy. It has resulted in the fewest fatalities per unit of energy delivered than any other system, including wind and solar. It also has the smallest environmental footprint. Our unfounded fear of radiation, reinforced by decades of fearmongering, has prevented us from building any new plants in the U.S. for decades and has exacerbated the climate challenge.

Given the urgency to reduce carbon emissions, it is foolish to shut down working nuclear power plants. Instead, we should support their continued operation, and promote building and exporting new walk-away safe nuclear power plants. I have written and spoken on this subject extensively and welcome you to read more about it in book, A Cubic Mile of Oil,” or on earlier posts on this blog. Additionally, you may want to look at, “A Bright Future” by Joshua Goldstein and Steffan Qvist.

Respectfully,
Ripudaman Malhotra

10 comments:

  1. Shouldn't there be something between "for" and "would"?
    "Just replacing one coal power plant with wind and solar along with a modest amount of battery storage for would require half the global production of lithium in 2018!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for catching! I deleted the superfluous "for."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kudos for reaching across the divide as you did. We need more sincere efforts at communication like this!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't forget to recommend RoadmapToNowhere.com!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent! I hope Jane sees your letter and does as you suggest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had posted the letter on her Facebook page about 10 days ago, but it gained not much traction. So I decided to put in on my blog and Tweet it to her. I will gladly accept any help to get it to her.

      Delete
  6. Thanks for doing this, Ripu, I had the same idea and got it started but did not get it sent. Because the fictions portrayed in The China Syndrome have been so detrimental to nuclear power, Jane Fonda almost has an obligation to speak the truth to those who may have been misled by the fears her film created. She would do it if she really cared to see us solve the climate crisis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Valerie. Do you have a way to reach her? You may want to Tweet her this post. Her Twitter handle is @JaneFonda.

      Delete
  7. It seems to me people are hung up on the problem? of disposing of nuclear waste. Is this nuclear power's weak point?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You are right that people are hung up on the "waste" issue. Actually, it is a non issue. First, it is a resource for next-generation of nuclear power plants as it contains about 90% of the fuel value in it. Second, it is a trivial amount safely contained in concrete casks at plant sites. Read my earlier post of Aug. 21, 2019.

    ReplyDelete